This is very impractical for video capture as it’s not only time consuming, but also makes rack focusing impossible. To achieve sharp images, both taking and anamorphic lenses need to be focused individually to the same distance. I’ve tried long and hard to find a way (without much success) to attach Proskar directly to a taking lens without special clamps, but to make your life simple you really do need one of anamorphic clamps that are fortunately quite cheap and pretty straightforward to use.Ģnd limitation is “double focusing”. Being a projection lens, Proskar-16 wasn’t designed to be used with cameras, therefore there are few limitations that need to be addressed when using this and most other anamorphic projection lenses for video capture.ġst issue is attaching one of these to a “taking lens”. I did not want to invest into something I wasn’t sure about, but I must say, anamorphic look is addictive, although I’m sure there are a lot of people who think otherwise.īefore we talk about the creative characteristics (the good stuff) of this lens, let’s quickly talk about it the technical characteristics, quirks and limitations (the bad stuff). Proskar-16 is one of the most affordable anamorphic lenses out there, which is the reason why this was my first anamorphic lens. Going back to November 2013, this is where my anamorphic journey started with the PROSKAR ISHICO-16 2x anamorphic projection lens therefore this is the lens I want to review first. I don’t claim to be an anamorphic lens expert and as always, my review is based on my own option and experience. Now that I’ve tried quite a few and understand them quite well, I’m ready to present you my first (of many) anamorphic lens review. Over the last few years I’ve been slowly learning about and collecting various anamorphic lenses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |